A propagandist-in-chief's war on intellectual imperialism and pursuit of a resistance episteme

Posts Tagged: Moqdad

Text

Very interesting what Nasrallah DIDN’T mention or say: no condemnation of the Moqdad abductions as many had expected or were hoping for. No call for the release of the hostages, nothing, only shifting responsibility away from Hizbullah by declaring “it’s outside of our control” while laying blame on the media for the community’s outrage. In fact, Nasrallah launched an unprecedentedly scathing attack on Lebanese media for inciting the families of the 11 hostages in Syria with lies about their deaths which in turn, triggered the recent developments. This will definitely worry Turkey and the FSA who may have been banking on Hizbullah taking a tougher stand on the Moqdadi kidnapping phenomenon. Most likely Hizbullah knows it can contain a sectarian escalation should matters reach that point, hence its seemingly neutral stand vis-a-vis the kidnappings of FSA. There may also be an awareness that the abductions may succeed in securing the release of the Lebanese pilgrims where other efforts have failed (i.e. Hariri’s mediation with the Turks).   

Regarding Israel, Nasrallah insinuated that chemical depots would be targets in any future war with Israel when he said :We cannot destroy Israel but there are some targets I wont name in occupied Palestine, which can be targeted with a small number of missiles. I’d like to tell them we know of a number of targets, not a high number because we do not need a high number. And we have the missiles and they are ready and hidden…..We, Hezbollah, with our capabilities I cannot say that we can destroy Israel, but I can say that we can turn the lives of millions of Israelis in occupied Palestine into a living hell.”

Very important to note how this changes the previous equation of striking Tel Aviv if Israel attacks Beirut and Haifa for Dahyeh, and even the modified equation of Tel Aviv for Dahyeh. The new equation is if you attempt to “destroy Lebanon” [as Israeli officials have recently threatened], we will attack sensitive chemical targets that will cause mass destruction effecting hundreds of thousands of lives and which will cause “tens of thousands” of fatalities rather than the “few hundred” Israeli officials were boasting of.

div>
Text

Some historical context to the Miqdad clan’s abduction of over 20 Syrian FSA fighters: If the AMAL movement was a response to the state’s negligence of South Lebanon on the economic and security levels, and Hizbullah was a reaction to Israel’s invasion and occupation of Lebanon in 1982, then Moqdadism is surely an expression of Shi’ite rage and frustration today; rage at the FSA’s kidnapping of Lebanese Shi’ites, frustration at the government’s inability to release the captives or to curb Sunni sectarian violence in Lebanon and the rise of takfiri jihadi groups; anger at the state’s war on hashish cultivation in the Bekaa and the resultant impoverishment of the region and its inhabitants; wrath against March 14 politicians who have abetted the FSA and other militants in infiltrating men and weapons into Lebanon, and for for stoking the seeds of sectarian warfare.

While Hizbullah’s hands have been tied due to sectarian sensitivities, Shi’ite tribes and clans in the Bekaa are clearly not constrained by similar considerations. Hizbullah has only limited influence over these families—numbering in the tens of thousands—who are accustomed to taking justice into their own hands. But by kidnapping foreign fighters, diplomats and others, they  have unwittingly become regional players and a clearly significant force that the Syrian opposition and its Saudi, Qatari and Turkish backers have to contend with from now on.  

div>